Histories of The University
| University of the Arctic portal |
- Michael Hayden 'Seeking a Balance: The University of Saskatchewan, 1907–1982' (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1982)
- Michael Hayden. "The Fight that Underhill Missed: Government and Academic Freedom at the University of Saskatchewan, 1919–1920." In Academic Freedom: Harry Crowe Memorial Lectures 1986, edited by Michiel Horn. North York: York University, 1987.
- Arthur S. Morton, Saskatchewan: The Making of a University (Toronto: University of Toronto Press) Call Number Peake 347.M.08.0
- Shirley Spafford 'No Ordinary Academics: Economics and Political Science at the University of Saskatchewan, 1910–1960' (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, July 1, 2000)
- James Sutherland Thomson, Yesteryears at the University of Saskatchewan 1937 - 1949 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1949) Call Number 347.M.10.0
- W.P. Thompson, University of Saskatchewan: A Personal History, The (Toronto: University of Toronto Press) Call Number Peake 365.2.M.01.0
Read more about this topic: University Of Saskatchewan, Aboriginal
Famous quotes containing the words histories of the, histories of, histories and/or university:
“Histories of the world omitted China; if a Chinaman invented compass or movable type or gunpowder we promptly “forgot it” and named their European inventors. In short, we regarded China as a sort of different and quite inconsequential planet.”
—W.E.B. (William Edward Burghardt)
“The histories of the lives and fortunes of men are full of instances of this nature,—where favorable times and lucky accidents have done for them, what wisdom or skill could not.”
—Laurence Sterne (1713–1768)
“The histories of the lives and fortunes of men are full of instances of this nature,—where favorable times and lucky accidents have done for them, what wisdom or skill could not.”
—Laurence Sterne (1713–1768)
“It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
—Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)