Critical PsychologyMain article: Critical psychology
Critical psychology is a sub-discipline aimed at evaluating mainstream psychology and attempts to apply psychology in more progressive ways, often looking towards social change as a means of preventing and treating psychopathology. One of critical psychology's main objections to conventional psychology is that it ignores the way power differences between social classes and groups can affect the mental and physical well-being of individuals or groups of people. Contributors to the field include Klaus Holzkamp and Ian Parker. Key elements within critical psychology include the study of power relations, situated knowledge, and the dualisms of the self and the agency, and the individual and the social. A discursive strain of critical psychology was developed in the 1990s by Jonathan Potter and Derek Edwards. Discursive psychology examines how psychological phenomena are created, made relevant, and put to use in discourse, verbal interaction, and everyday talk. It is opposed to cognitivist approaches.
Other articles related to "critical psychology, psychology":
... The Annual Review of Critical Psychology is a peer-reviewed academic journal in the field of critical psychology ... The first issue, on the foundations of critical psychology, was published in 1999 ... Starting in 2006, the Annual Review of Critical Psychology has been published as an open-access online journal ...
... Critical psychology in the United States and Canada has, for the most part, focused on critiques of mainstream psychology's support for an unjust ... No departments of critical psychology exist, with the exception of the Bachelor's Completion Program with a minor in Critical Psychology, offered at the California Institute ... efforts include the 1993 founding of RadPsyNet Radical Psychology Network, the 1997 publication of Critical Psychology An Introduction (edited by Dennis Fox and Isaac Prilleltensky expanded 2009 ...
Famous quotes containing the words psychology and/or critical:
“Psychology has nothing to say about what women are really like, what they need and what they want, essentially because psychology does not know.... this failure is not limited to women; rather, the kind of psychology that has addressed itself to how people act and who they are has failed to understand in the first place why people act the way they do, and certainly failed to understand what might make them act differently.”
—Naomi Weisstein, U.S. psychologist, feminist, and author. Psychology Constructs the Female (1969)
“Productive collaborations between family and school, therefore, will demand that parents and teachers recognize the critical importance of each others participation in the life of the child. This mutuality of knowledge, understanding, and empathy comes not only with a recognition of the child as the central purpose for the collaboration but also with a recognition of the need to maintain roles and relationships with children that are comprehensive, dynamic, and differentiated.”
—Sara Lawrence Lightfoot (20th century)