Free Software Licenses
All free software licenses must grant users all the freedoms discussed above. However, unless the applications' licenses are compatible, combining programs by mixing source code or directly linking binaries is problematic, because of license technicalities. Programs indirectly connected together may avoid this problem.
The majority of free software falls under a small set of licenses. The most popular of these licenses are:
- the GNU General Public License
- the GNU Lesser General Public License
- the BSD License
- the Mozilla Public License
- the MIT License
- the Apache License
The Free Software Foundation and the Open Source Initiative both publish lists of licenses that they find to comply with their own definitions of free software and open-source software respectively.
- List of FSF approved software licenses
- List of OSI approved software licenses
The FSF list is not prescriptive: free licenses can exist that the FSF has not heard about, or considered important enough to write about. So it's possible for a license to be free and not in the FSF list. The OSI list only lists licenses that have been submitted, considered and approved. All Open Source licenses must meet the Open Source Definition in order to be officially recognized as open source software. Free software on the other hand is a more informal classification that does not rely on official recognition. Nevertheless, software licensed under licenses that do not meet the Free Software Definition cannot rightly be considered free software.
Apart from these two organizations, the Debian project is seen by some to provide useful advice on whether particular licenses comply with their Debian Free Software Guidelines. Debian doesn't publish a list of approved licenses, so its judgments have to be tracked by checking what software they have allowed into their software archives. That is summarized at the Debian web site.
It is rare that a license announced as being in-compliance with the FSF guidelines does not also meet the Open Source Definition, although the reverse is not necessarily true (for example, the NASA Open Source Agreement is an OSI-approved license, but non-free according to FSF).
Read more about this topic: Free Software
Other articles related to "software, free, licenses, free software license, license, free software licenses, free software":
... A great variety of software companies and programmers in the world comprise a software industry ... Software can be quite a profitable industry Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft was the richest person in the world in 2009 largely by selling the Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office software ... The same goes for Larry Ellison, largely through his Oracle database software ...
... Free and open-source licenses generally fall under two categories Those with the aim to have minimal requirements about how the software can be redistributed (permissive licenses), and those that ... An example of a copyleft free software license is the GNU General Public License (GPL) ... This license is aimed at giving all user unlimited freedom to use, study, and privately modify the software, and if the user adheres to the terms and conditions of GPL, freedom to redistribute the ...
... There are different categories of free software ... Public domain software – the copyright has expired, the work was not copyrighted, or the author has released the software onto the public domain (in ... Since public-domain software lacks copyright protection, it may be freely incorporated into any work, whether proprietary or free ...
... recognisable mascot, a number of games by Amstrad's in-house software publisher Amsoft have been tagged with the Roland name ...
Famous quotes containing the word free:
“Actually we are a vulgar, pushing mob whose passions are easily mobilized by demagogues, newspaper men, religious quacks, agitators and such like. To call this a society of free peoples is blasphemous. What have we to offer the world besides the superabundant loot which we recklessly plunder from the earth under the maniacal delusion that this insane activity represents progress and enlightenment?”
—Henry Miller (18911980)