A Sketch of The Proof
Here we sketch a proof which is similar but not identical to that given by Banach and Tarski. Essentially, the paradoxical decomposition of the ball is achieved in four steps:
- Find a paradoxical decomposition of the free group in two generators.
- Find a group of rotations in 3-d space isomorphic to the free group in two generators.
- Use the paradoxical decomposition of that group and the axiom of choice to produce a paradoxical decomposition of the hollow unit sphere.
- Extend this decomposition of the sphere to a decomposition of the solid unit ball.
We now discuss each of these steps in more detail.
The free group with two generators a and b consists of all finite strings that can be formed from the four symbols a, a−1, b and b−1 such that no a appears directly next to an a−1 and no b appears directly next to a b−1. Two such strings can be concatenated and converted into a string of this type by repeatedly replacing the "forbidden" substrings with the empty string. For instance: abab−1a−1 concatenated with abab−1a yields abab−1a−1abab−1a, which contains the substring a−1a, and so gets reduced to abaab−1a. One can check that the set of those strings with this operation forms a group with identity element the empty string e. We will call this group F2.
The group can be "paradoxically decomposed" as follows: let S(a) be the set of all strings that start with a and define S(a−1), S(b) and S(b−1) similarly. Clearly,
but also
and
The notation aS(a−1) means take all the strings in S(a−1) and concatenate them on the left with a.
Make sure that you understand this last line, because it is at the core of the proof. For example, there may be a string in the set which, because of the rule that must not appear next to, reduces to the string . In this way, contains all the strings that start with . Similarly, it contains all the strings that start with (for example the string which reduces to ).
We have cut our group F2 into four pieces (plus the singleton {e}), then "shifted" two of them by multiplying with a or b, then "reassembled" two pieces to make one copy of and the other two to make another copy of . That is exactly what we want to do to the ball.
Read more about this topic: Banach–Tarski Paradox
Famous quotes containing the words sketch and/or proof:
“We criticize a man or a book most sharply when we sketch out their ideal.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (18441900)
“Ah! I have penetrated to those meadows on the morning of many a first spring day, jumping from hummock to hummock, from willow root to willow root, when the wild river valley and the woods were bathed in so pure and bright a light as would have waked the dead, if they had been slumbering in their graves, as some suppose. There needs no stronger proof of immortality. All things must live in such a light. O Death, where was thy sting? O Grave, where was thy victory, then?”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)