Federal Marriage Amendment
For information about the amendment, see Federal Marriage Amendment.
For arguments for and against same-sex marriage in general, see Same-sex marriage#Controversies. The Alliance for Marriage’s amendment introduced in 2002 consisted of two clauses. It stated:
"Marriage in the United States of America shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman." "Neither this constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups."
Controversy surrounding the second sentence of the original amendment has led to an alternative version that only includes the first sentence. However, only the original amendment was debated in the Senate when it came up for a vote on July 14, 2004. The Federal Marriage Amendment was widely considered a significant issue in the 2004 presidential election, and the continued political disagreement over the definition of marriage has become an important and divisive issue in American politics. For more information on this controversy, see Same-sex marriage in the United States. In the wake of the Democratic takeover of Congress (see United States general elections, 2006) and the new leadership that does not share their views, the Alliance for Marriage announced they were shifting their focus from the Congressional level to the state level. They plan on building a nationwide network of state lawmakers who would support the Federal Marriage Amendment. Ultimately, three-fourths of the state legislatures would have to approve any federal constitutional amendment.
Read more about this topic: Alliance For Marriage
Famous quotes containing the words federal, marriage and/or amendment:
“There are always those who are willing to surrender local self-government and turn over their affairs to some national authority in exchange for a payment of money out of the Federal Treasury. Whenever they find some abuse needs correction in their neighborhood, instead of applying the remedy themselves they seek to have a tribunal sent on from Washington to discharge their duties for them, regardless of the fact that in accepting such supervision they are bartering away their freedom.”
—Calvin Coolidge (1872–1933)
“Divorce is probably of nearly the same date as marriage. I believe, however, that marriage is some weeks the more ancient.”
—Voltaire [François Marie Arouet] (1694–1778)
“Every family should extend First Amendment rights to all its members, but this freedom is particularly essential for our kids. Children must be able to say what they think, openly express their feelings, and ask for what they want and need if they are ever able to develop an integrated sense of self. They must be able to think their own thoughts, even if they differ from ours. They need to have the opportunity to ask us questions when they don’t understand what we mean.”
—Stephanie Martson (20th century)