Keynesian Revolution

The Keynesian Revolution was a fundamental reworking of economic theory concerning the factors determining employment levels in the overall economy. The revolution was set against the then orthodox economic framework: Neoclassical economics.

The early stage of the Keynesian Revolution took place in the years following the publication of Keynes' General Theory in 1936. It saw the neoclassical understanding of employment replaced with Keynes' view that demand, and not supply, is the driving factor determining levels of employment. This provided Keynes and his supporters with a theoretical basis to argue that governments should intervene to alleviate severe unemployment. With Keynes unable to take much part in theoretical debate after 1937, a process swiftly got under way to reconcile his work with the old system to form Neo-Keynesian economics, a mixture of neoclassical economics and Keynesian economics. The process of mixing these schools is referred to as the neoclassical synthesis, and Neo-Keynesian economics can be summarized as "Keynesian in macroeconomics, neoclassical in microeconomics".

Read more about Keynesian RevolutionSummary, Theory of Employment, Background, The Course of The Revolution, The Revolution That Never Was, Significance, See Also

Other articles related to "keynesian revolution, keynesian, keynesians":

Keynesian Revolution - See Also
... John Maynard Keynes 2008-2009 Keynesian resurgence Post-war displacement of Keynesianism Keynesian economics Paradigm Shift ...
Luigi Pasinetti - Theoretical Contributions - Keynes and The Cambridge Keynesians
... Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians (2007) is the latest book published by Pasinetti ... Therein, Pasinetti proposes to consider Keynesian economics as an alternative paradigm to Neoclassical economics, emphasizing the contributions of the Cambridge Keynesians as well as ... That is, Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians is composed of three parts or, more properly, of three Books ...

Famous quotes containing the word revolution:

    But a cultivated man becomes ashamed of his property, out of new respect for his nature. Especially he hates what he has if he see that it is accidental,—came to him by inheritance, or gift, or crime; then he feels that it is not having; it does not belong to him, has no root in him and merely lies there because no revolution or no robber takes it away.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)