**A Simple Empirical Model**

The empirical literature on testing for contagion has focused on increases in the correlation of returns between markets during periods of crisis. Forbes and Rigobon (2002) begin by discussing the current imprecision and disagreement surrounding the term contagion. It proposes a concrete definition, a significant increase in cross-market linkages after a shock, and suggests using the term “interdependence” in order to differentiate this explicit definition from the existing literature. It shows the elementary weakness of simple correlation tests: with an unchanged regression coefficient, a rise in the variance of the explanatory variable reduces the coefficient standard error, causing a rise in the correlation of a regression. The regression underlying contagion tests is as follows:

X_{t}=θ(L)X

_{t}+Θ(L)I

_{t}+ξ

_{t}(1) X

_{t}={x

_{t}c,x

_{t}j} (2) I

_{t}={i

_{t}c, i

_{t}US, i

_{t}j} (3)

where t is the time period for all variables; xc is the stock market return in the crisis country;, xj is the stock market return in another market j; X_{t} is a transposed vector of returns in the same two stock markets; Θ(L) and θ(L) are vectors of lags; ic, ius, and i_{j} are short-term interest rates for the crisis country, the United States, and country j, respectively; and ξ_{t} is a vector of reduced-form disturbances. For each series of tests, they first use the VAR (vector autoregression) model in equations (1) through (3) to estimate the variance-covariance matrices for each pair of countries during the stable period, turmoil period, and full period. Then we use the estimated variance-covariance matrices to calculate the cross-market correlation coefficients (and their asymptotic distributions) for each set of markets and periods.

As Pesaran and Pick (2007) observe, however, financial contagion is a difficult system to estimate econometrically. To disentangle contagion from interaction effects, county-specific variables have to be used to instrument foreign returns. Choosing the crisis period introduces sample selection bias, and it has to be assumed that crisis periods are sufficiently long to allow correlations to be reliably estimated. In consequence, there appears to be no strong consensus in the empirical literature as to whether contagion occurs between markets, or how strong it is.

Read more about this topic: Financial Contagion

### Other articles related to "a simple empirical model, empirical, simple, model":

**A Simple Empirical Model**

... The

**empirical**literature on testing for contagion has focused on increases in the correlation of returns between markets during periods of crisis ... It shows the elementary weakness of

**simple**correlation tests with an unchanged regression coefficient, a rise in the variance of the explanatory variable reduces the ... For each series of tests, they first use the VAR (vector autoregression)

**model**in equations (1) through (3) to estimate the variance-covariance matrices for each pair of countries ...

### Famous quotes containing the words model, simple and/or empirical:

“The Battle of Waterloo is a work of art with tension and drama with its unceasing change from hope to fear and back again, change which suddenly dissolves into a moment of extreme catastrophe, a *model* tragedy because the fate of Europe was determined within this individual fate.”

—Stefan Zweig (18811942)

“a mind

That nobleness made *simple* as a fire,

With beauty like a tightened bow,”

—William Butler Yeats (1865–1939)

“To develop an empiricist account of science is to depict it as involving a search for truth only about the *empirical* world, about what is actual and observable.... It must involve throughout a resolute rejection of the demand for an explanation of the regularities in the observable course of nature, by means of truths concerning a reality beyond what is actual and observable, as a demand which plays no role in the scientific enterprise.”

—Bas Van Fraassen (b. 1941)