Dual Number - Algebraic Properties

Algebraic Properties

In abstract algebra terms, the dual numbers can be described as the quotient of the polynomial ring R by the ideal generated by the polynomial X2,


The image of X in the quotient is the "imaginary" unit ε. With this description, it is clear that the dual numbers form a commutative ring with characteristic 0. Moreover the inherited multiplication gives the dual numbers the structure of a commutative and associative algebra over the reals of dimension two. The algebra is not a division algebra or field since the imaginary elements are not invertible. In fact, all of the nonzero imaginary elements are zero divisors (also see the section "Division"). The algebra of dual numbers is isomorphic to the exterior algebra of .

Read more about this topic:  Dual Number

Other articles related to "algebraic properties":

Möbius–Kantor Graph - Algebraic Properties
... The generalized Petersen graph G(n,k) is vertex-transitive if and only if n = 10 and k =2 or if k2 ≡ ±1 (mod n) and is edge-transitive only in the following seven cases (n,k) = (4,1), (5,2), (8,3), (10,2), (10,3), (12,5), or (24,5) (Frucht, Graver Watkins 1971) ... So the Möbius–Kantor graph is one of only seven symmetric Generalized Petersen graphs ...
Prime Power - Properties - Algebraic Properties
... The number of elements of a finite field is always a prime power and conversely, every prime power occurs as the number of elements in some finite field (which is unique up to isomorphism). ...

Famous quotes containing the words properties and/or algebraic:

    The reason why men enter into society, is the preservation of their property; and the end why they choose and authorize a legislative, is, that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the members of the society: to limit the power, and moderate the dominion, of every part and member of the society.
    John Locke (1632–1704)

    I have no scheme about it,—no designs on men at all; and, if I had, my mode would be to tempt them with the fruit, and not with the manure. To what end do I lead a simple life at all, pray? That I may teach others to simplify their lives?—and so all our lives be simplified merely, like an algebraic formula? Or not, rather, that I may make use of the ground I have cleared, to live more worthily and profitably?
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)