In Western jurisprudence, concurrence (also contemporaneity or simultaneity) is the apparent need to prove the simultaneous occurrence of both actus reus ("guilty action") and mens rea ("guilty mind"), to constitute a crime; except in crimes of strict liability. In theory, if the actus reus does not hold concurrence in point of time with the mens rea then no crime has been committed.

Read more about ConcurrenceDiscussion, The Problem, Single Transaction Principle, English Case Law Examples

Other articles related to "concurrence":

Lynch V. Donnelly - Concurrence
... The Establishment Clause prohibits government from making adherence to a religion relevant in any way to a person's standing in the political community ... Government can run afoul of that prohibition in two principal ways ...
Reasons Of The Supreme Court Of Canada By Justice Sopinka - 1994-1997
... Native Women's Association of Canada v ... Canada, 1994 (Majority) R ...
Hampton V. United States - Decision - Majority - Concurrence
... "I do not understand Russell or earlier cases delineating the predisposition-focused defense of entrapment to have gone so far", Powell wrote ... He noted that the jurisprudence was very limited, and that the Court had, for one, not yet had the opportunity to consider an entrapment claim from some source other than controlled-substance enforcement ...