**BSI Evaluation Criteria**

The German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has established four criteria for quality of deterministic random number generators. They are summarized here:

- K1 — A sequence of random numbers with a low probability of containing identical consecutive elements.
- K2 — A sequence of numbers which is indistinguishable from 'true random' numbers according to specified statistical tests. The tests are the
*monobit*test (equal numbers of ones and zeros in the sequence),*poker*test (a special instance of the chi-squared test),*runs*test (counts the frequency of runs of various lengths),*longruns*test (checks whether there exists any run of length 34 or greater in 20 000 bits of the sequence) — both from BSI2 (AIS 20, v. 1, 1999) and FIPS (140-1, 1994), and the*autocorrelation*test. In essence, these requirements are a test of how well a bit sequence: has zeros and ones equally often; after a sequence of*n*zeros (or ones), the next bit a one (or zero) with probability one-half; and any selected subsequence contains no information about the next element(s) in the sequence. - K3 — It should be impossible for any attacker (for all practical purposes) to calculate, or otherwise guess, from any given sub-sequence, any previous or future values in the sequence, nor any inner state of the generator.
- K4 — It should be impossible, for all practical purposes, for an attacker to calculate, or guess from an inner state of the generator, any previous numbers in the sequence or any previous inner generator states.

For cryptographic applications, only generators meeting the K3 or K4 standard are acceptable.

Read more about this topic: Pseudorandom Number Generator

### Famous quotes containing the words criteria and/or evaluation:

“There are ... two minimum conditions necessary and sufficient for the existence of a legal system. On the one hand those rules of behavior which are valid according to the system’s ultimate *criteria* of validity must be generally obeyed, and on the other hand, its rules of recognition specifying the *criteria* of legal validity and its rules of change and adjudication must be effectively accepted as common public standards of official behavior by its officials.”

—H.L.A. (Herbert Lionel Adolphus)

“Good critical writing is measured by the perception and *evaluation* of the subject; bad critical writing by the necessity of maintaining the professional standing of the critic.”

—Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)