Later-no-harm Criterion - Examples - Instant Runoff Voting Variant With Majority Requirement

Instant Runoff Voting Variant With Majority Requirement

Traditional forms of instant runoff voting satisfy the later-no-harm criterion. But if a method permits incomplete ranking of candidates, and if a majority of initial round votes is required to win and avoid another election, that variant does not satisfy Later-no-harm. A lower preference vote cast may create a majority for that lower preference, whereas if the vote was not cast, the election could fail, proceed to a runoff, repeated ballot or other process, and the favored candidate could possibly win.

Assume, the votes are as follows:

40: A 39: B>A 21: C

In the Preferential voting method, described as an example in Robert's Rules of Order, elimination continues iteratively until "one pile contains more than half the ballots." Eliminating one of the two final candidate never changes who wins, but can change how many votes that final candidate receives. Thus, C would be eliminated, then B, and the B ballots would be counted for A, who would thereby obtain a majority and be elected.

Now, suppose the B voters would hide their second preference for A:

40: A 39: B 21: C

This failure to win a majority in the final round results in a runoff between A and B, which B could win.

By adding a second preference vote for A, the B voters eliminated the election possibility for B. Thus, this variant of instant runoff voting with majority requirement fails the later-no-harm criterion. In traditional IRV, A would have been elected by 40% of the voters, and the later-no-harm criterion would not have been violated.

Also, compliance of LNH can be reestablished by stopping the elimination process when there are two candidates left. Applying this to the example, the second preferences of B are ignored either case. Thus, the B voters would not violate later-no-harm by indicating A as a second choice.

Read more about this topic:  Later-no-harm Criterion, Examples

Famous quotes containing the words majority, requirement, variant, instant and/or voting:

    If we are to take for the criterion of truth the majority of suffrages, they ought to be gotten from those philosophic and patriotic citizens who cultivate their reason.
    James Madison (1751–1836)

    The first requirement of politics is not intellect or stamina but patience. Politics is a very long run game and the tortoise will usually beat the hare.
    John Major (b. 1943)

    “I am willing to die for my country” is a variant of “I am willing to kill for my country.”
    Mason Cooley (b. 1927)

    Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the forces by which nature is animated and the respective positions of the beings which compose it, if moreover this intelligence were vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in the same formula both the movements of the largest bodies in the universe and those of the lightest atom; to it nothing would be uncertain, and the future as the past would be present to its eyes.
    Pierre Simon De Laplace (1749–1827)

    Common sense should tell us that reading is the ultimate weapon—destroying ignorance, poverty and despair before they can destroy us. A nation that doesn’t read much doesn’t know much. And a nation that doesn’t know much is more likely to make poor choices in the home, the marketplace, the jury box and the voting booth...The challenge, therefore, is to convince future generations of children that carrying a book is more rewarding than carrying guns.
    Jim Trelease (20th century)