As a military camouflage expert during the Second World War, Cott likened the functions of military camouflage with those of protective coloration in nature. The three main categories of camouflage in his book Adaptive Coloration in Animals are concealment, disguise, and advertisement. Within those categories, he studied, described and presented examples of such diverse effects as obliterative shading, disruption, differential blending, high contrast, coincident disruption, concealment of the eye, contour obliteration, shadow elimination, and mimicry. In his wartime lectures at Farnham Castle, he described nine categories of visual deception:
- merging, e.g. hare, polar bear
- disruption, e.g. ringed plover
- disguise, e.g. stick insect
- mis-direction, e.g. butterfly and fish eyespots
- dazzle, e.g. some grasshoppers
- decoy, e.g. angler fish
- smokescreen, e.g. cuttlefish
- the dummy, e.g. flies, ants
- false display of strength, e.g. toads, lizards
Cott's account of all this (illustrated by his own pen and ink drawings) is Adaptive Coloration in Animals. This 550-page classic continues to be one of the finest, most comprehensive discussions of the subject. His co-workers' first-hand accounts of his work in military camouflage can be found in the memoirs of two of his fellow camoufleurs: Julian Trevelyan and Roland Penrose.
Peter Forbes wrote of Cott's book:Cott's Adaptive Coloration in Animals must be the only compendious zoology tract ever to be packed in a soldier's kitbag. The book also marks the apotheosis of the descriptive natural history phase of mimicry studies. Although Cott does report experiments on predation to test the efficacy of mimicry and camouflage, the book is essentially a narrative of examples plus theory.
Cott worked to persuade the British army to use more effective camouflage techniques, including countershading. For example, in August 1940, with the Battle of Britain imminent, he painted two rail-mounted coastal guns, one in conventional style, one countershaded. In aerial photographs, the countershaded gun is essentially invisible. Cott was triumphant, announcing:These photographs furnish most convincing proof of the effectiveness of countershading, and are especially valuable in that we have in them a direct comparison between the two methods.
Read more about this topic: Hugh B. Cott
Other articles related to "camouflage research, camouflage":
... In 1942, during WWII, Earl established a camouflage research and training division at General Motors, one consequence of which was a 22-page document called Camouflage Manual for General Motors Camouflage ... A decade before, two former WWI camouflage artists, Harold Ledyard Towle (a U.S ... Navy camouflage during both World Wars) had worked as designers at General Motors ...
... Naval Reserves) and others for the purpose of researching naval camouflage in relation to optics and physics (Ackerman 1930, p ... that visual artists would be better equipped than scientists to develop camouflage ... Navy camouflage unit, consisting of two major sections A design section made up of artists, located in Washington D.C ...
Famous quotes containing the word research:
“Our science has become terrible, our research dangerous, our findings deadly. We physicists have to make peace with reality. Reality is not as strong as we are. We will ruin reality.”
—Friedrich Dürrenmatt (19211990)