Fuel Economy and Environmental Performance
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has rated the fuel economy for the 2010 Fusion Hybrid at 41 miles per US gallon (5.7 L/100 km; 49 mpg) city, 36 miles per US gallon (6.5 L/100 km; 43 mpg) highway. The following table compares fuel economy, carbon footprint, and petroleum consumption between the hybrid version and other drivetrains of the Fusion family as estimated by the EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy:
Economic and environmental performance comparison among the several Fusion powertrains available in the U.S. market |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of Powertrain |
Type of fuel |
Year model |
EPA City mileage (mpg) |
EPA Highway mileage (mpg) |
Annual fuel cost (USD) |
Carbon footprint (Ton/yr of CO2) |
Annual Petroleum Use (barrel) |
Hybrid electric FWD Automatic (variable gear ratios), 4 cyl, 2.5L |
Gasoline | 2011 | 41 | 36 | $1,083 | 4.8 | 8.8 |
FWD Automatic 6-spd, 4 cyl, 2.5L | Gasoline | 2011 | 23 | 33 | $1,629 | 7.2 | 13.2 |
FWD Automatic (S6), 6 cyl, 3.0L | Gasoline | 2011 | 20 | 28 | $1,840 | 8.1 | 14.9 |
E85 flex-fuel | 2011 | 14 | 21 | $2,269 | 6.6 | 5.0 | |
FWD Automatic (S6), 6 cyl, 3.5L | Gasoline | 2011 | 18 | 27 | $2,013 | 8.9 | 16.3 |
AWD Automatic (S6), 6 cyl, 3.0L | Gasoline | 2011 | 18 | 26 | $2,115 | 9.3 | 17.1 |
E85 flex-fuel | 2011 | 13 | 19 | $2,421 | 7.1 | 5.3 | |
The Ford Fusion Hybrid EPA's fuel economy rating is better than the 2011 Toyota Camry Hybrid (32 miles per gallon city, 33 highway), the Nissan Altima Hybrid (35 miles per gallon city, 33 highway), and the Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid (26 miles per gallon city, 34 highway), considered its main competitors in the mid-size sedan segment. The newer 2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid LE model (43 miles per gallon city, 39 highway) now has an advantage over the 2012 Ford Fusion (41 miles per gallon city, 39 highway) by a slight margin in the city.
among the Fusion Hybrid and same class hybrid models available in the U.S.
Vehicle | Year model |
EPA City mileage (mpg) |
EPA Highway mileage (mpg) |
Annual fuel cost (USD) |
Tailpipe emissions (grams per mile CO2) |
EPA Air Pollution Score Cal/Other |
Annual Petroleum Use (barrel) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toyota Prius (3rd gen) | 2010/11/12 | 51 | 48 | $1,150 | 178 | 9/7 | 6.6 |
Honda Civic Hybrid | 2012 | 44 | 44 | $1,300 | 202 | 9/8 | 7.5 |
Toyota Prius v | 2012 | 44 | 40 | $1,350 | 212 | 8/7 | 7.8 |
Lexus CT 200h | 2011/12 | 43 | 40 | $1,350 | 212 | 8/7 | 7.8 |
Honda Insight (2nd gen) | 2012 | 41 | 41 | $1,350 | 212 | 9/7 | 7.8 |
Honda Civic Hybrid | 2010 | 40 | 45 | $1,350 | 212 | 9/8 | 7.8 |
Honda Civic Hybrid | 2011 | 40 | 43 | $1,400 | 217 | 9/8 | 8.0 |
Honda Insight (2nd gen) | 2010/11 | 40 | 43 | $1,400 | 217 | 9/8 | 8.0 |
Toyota Camry Hybrid LE (XV50) | 2012 | 43 | 39 | $1,400 | 217 | 9/7 | 8.0 |
Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE (XV50) | 2012 | 40 | 38 | $1,400 | 222 | 9/7 | 8.2 |
Ford Fusion Hybrid Mercury Milan Hybrid Lincoln MKZ Hybrid |
2010/11/12 2010/11 2011/12 |
41 | 36 | $1,450 | 228 | 9/7 | 8.4 |
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Kia Optima Hybrid |
2011/12 | 35 | 40 | $1,550 | 240 | 8/8 | 8.9 |
Nissan Altima Hybrid | 2010 | 35 | 33 | $1,650 | 261 | 9 | 9.7 |
Toyota Camry Hybrid | 2010 | 33 | 34 | $1,650 | 261 | 9/7 | 9.7 |
Nissan Altima Hybrid | 2011 | 33 | 33 | $1,700 | 269 | 9 | 10.0 |
Toyota Camry Hybrid | 2011 | 31 | 35 | $1,700 | 269 | 9/7 | 10.0 |
In 2009, Edmunds tested a Fusion Hybrid over two days of mixed city and highway driving against other hybrids or fuel efficient cars like the Toyota Prius, the Honda Insight, the Volkswagen Jetta TDI automatic and the MINI Cooper with manual transmission. The results are summarized in the following table:
Edmunds comparison of the Fusion Hybridwith several hybrids and fuel efficient cars
(mpg)
Vehicle | Back roads | City loop | Highway | Overall | EPA City/Hwy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 Toyota Prius | 47.2 | 48.7 | 47.4 | 47.6 | 51/48 |
2010 Honda Insight | 44.1 | 43.4 | 38.6 | 42.3 | 40/43 |
2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI A6 | 41.2 | 31.6 | 40.6 | 38.1 | 29/40 |
2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid | 39.6 | 35.1 | 36.0 | 37.3 | 41/36 |
2009 MINI Cooper M6 | 38.5 | 30.1 | 33.3 | 34.5 | 28/37 |
Motor Trend found that their Fusion Hybrid delivered only 33.5 miles per US gallon (7.02 L/100 km; 40.2 mpg) in 500 miles (800 km) of mixed driving, 5 mpg off the EPA combined rating. Over another 160 miles (260 km) of testing against a Toyota Camry Hybrid, the same car only achieved 31.8 miles per US gallon (7.40 L/100 km; 38.2 mpg), while the Camry Hybrid delivered 32.7 miles per US gallon (7.19 L/100 km; 39.3 mpg). "If our early numbers hold up, the Fusion Hybrid would be a rare instance of the EPA relapsing into the world of mileage make-believe." However, they noted that when driven very conservatively, the EPA numbers could be achieved. "In typical driving, you might as well throw the Fusion's EPA numbers out the window. But if you decide to really work at it, they're possible." Car and Driver also tested a Fusion Hybrid and achieved no more than 34 miles per US gallon (6.9 L/100 km; 41 mpg) over 300 miles (480 km) of driving, which was greater than the Camry Hybrid (31 miles per US gallon (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg)) or Nissan Altima Hybrid (32 miles per US gallon (7.4 L/100 km; 38 mpg)) though not by the margin indicated by the EPA ratings.
According to Ford, the vehicle was built to have a fuel efficiency of 41 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway by EPA standards. On December 2008, Autoblog Green staff reported they had obtained in-city mileage of 43.1 mpg on the streets of Los Angeles. In addition, a Los Angeles Times reporter informed in December 2008 that he had obtained 52 mpg in mixed city-highway driving with little difficulty.
On a single-tank publicity stunt conducted on April 2009, a Fusion Hybrid managed 81.5 miles per US gallon (2.89 L/100 km; 97.9 mpg) on a 1,445.7 mile trip.
Edmunds' InsideLine received a 2010 Fusion Hybrid as a long-term test car. Over 11,000 miles (18,000 km) of driving, their vehicle had only averaged 31.3 mpg (7.51 L/100 km; 37.6 mpg), with a best tank of 37.7 mpg (6.24 L/100 km; 45.3 mpg) and a worst tank of 24.4 mpg (9.64 L/100 km; 29.3 mpg).
- Payback time
According to Edmunds.com, the price premium paid for the Fusion Hybrid takes 5 years to recover in fuel savings as compared to its non-hybrid sibling, and is one of the quickest payback periods among top selling hybrids as of February 2012. Edmunds compared the hybrid version priced at US$27,678 with a comparably-equipped gasoline-powered Fusion priced at US$24,493 and found that the payback period is 6 years for gasoline at US$3 per gallon, 4 years at US$4 per gallon, and drops to 3 years with gasoline prices at US$5 per gallon. These estimates assume an average of 15,000 mi (24,000 km) annual driving and vehicle prices correspond to Edmunds.com's true market value estimates. For the same two vehicles, the U.S. EPA estimates the Fusion Hybrid annual fuel cost at US$1,431 while the gasoline-powered Fusion has an annual fuel cost of US$2,2,320. EPA estimates are based on 45% highway and 55% city driving, over 15,000 annual miles, and gasoline price of US$3.72 per gallon, the national average as of February 2012. The Lincoln MKZ Hybrid has no price premium.
Read more about this topic: Ford Fusion Hybrid, Safety
Famous quotes containing the words performance, fuel and/or economy:
“Having an identity at work separate from an identity at home means that the work role can help absorb some of the emotional shock of domestic distress. Even a mediocre performance at the office can help a person repair self-esteem damaged in domestic battles.”
—Faye J. Crosby (20th century)
“The particular source of frustration of women observing their own self-study and measuring their worth as women by the distance they kept from men necessitated that a distance be kept, and so what vindicated them also poured fuel on the furnace of their rage. One delight presumed another dissatisfaction, but their hatefulness confessed to their own lack of power to please. They hated men because they needed husbands, and they loathed the men they chased away for going.”
—Alexander Theroux (b. 1940)
“The aim of the laborer should be, not to get his living, to get a good job, but to perform well a certain work; and, even in a pecuniary sense, it would be economy for a town to pay its laborers so well that they would not feel that they were working for low ends, as for a livelihood merely, but for scientific, or even moral ends. Do not hire a man who does your work for money, but him who does it for love of it.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)