Animal Rights Activists - Philosophical and Legal Approaches - Utilitarianism


Further information: Equal consideration of interests and Utilitarianism
They talk about this thing in the head; what do they call it? That's it. What's that got to do with women's rights or Negroes' rights? If my cup won't hold but a pint and yours holds a quart, wouldn't you be mean not to let me have my little half-measure full? — Sojourner Truth

Nussbaum (2004) writes that utilitarianism, starting with Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, has contributed more to the recognition of the moral status of animals than any other ethical theory. The utilitarian philosopher most associated with animal rights is Peter Singer, professor of bioethics at Princeton University. Singer is not a rights theorist, but uses the language of rights to discuss how we ought to treat individuals. He is a preference utilitarian, meaning that he judges the rightness of an act by the extent to which it satisfies the preferences (interests) of those affected.

His position is that there is no reason not to give equal consideration to the interests of human and nonhumans, though his principle of equality does not require identical treatment. A mouse and a man both have an interest in not being kicked, and there are no moral or logical grounds for failing to accord those interests equal weight. Interests are predicated on the ability to suffer, nothing more, and once it is established that a being has interests, those interests must be given equal consideration. Singer quotes the English philosopher Henry Sidgwick (1838–1900): "The good of any one individual is of no more importance, from the point of view ... of the Universe, than the good of any other."

Singer argues that equality of consideration is a prescription, not an assertion of fact: if the equality of the sexes were based only on the idea that men and women were equally intelligent, we would have to abandon the practice of equal consideration if this were later found to be false. But the moral idea of equality does not depend on matters of fact such as intelligence, physical strength, or moral capacity. Equality therefore cannot be grounded on the outcome of scientific investigations into the intelligence of nonhumans. All that matters is whether they can suffer.

Commentators on all sides of the debate now accept that animals suffer and feel pain, although it was not always so. Bernard Rollin, professor of philosophy, animal sciences, and biomedical sciences at Colorado State University, writes that Descartes' influence continued to be felt until the 1980s. Veterinarians trained in the US before 1989 were taught to ignore pain, he writes, and at least one major veterinary hospital in the 1960s did not stock narcotic analgesics for animal pain control. In his interactions with scientists, he was often asked to "prove" that animals are conscious, and to provide "scientifically acceptable" evidence that they could feel pain. Scientific publications have made it clear since the 1980s that the majority of researchers do believe animals suffer and feel pain, though it continues to be argued that their suffering may be reduced by an inability to experience the same dread of anticipation as humans, or to remember the suffering as vividly. The problem of animal suffering, and animal consciousness in general, arose primarily because it was argued that animals have no language. Singer writes that, if language were needed to communicate pain, it would often be impossible to know when humans are in pain, though we can observe pain behavior and make a calculated guess based on it. He argues that there is no reason to suppose that the pain behavior of nonhumans would have a different meaning from the pain behavior of humans.

Read more about this topic:  Animal Rights Activists, Philosophical and Legal Approaches

Other articles related to "utilitarianism":

Utilitarianism - Application To Specific Issues - Human Rights
... Utilitarianism would also require the indirect impact of social acceptance of inhumane policies to be taken into consideration, and general anxiety and fear could increase for all if human rights are ... Under rule utilitarianism, a human right can easily be considered a moral rule ... Yang Zhu Schools of hedonism Cārvāka · Cyrenaics · Epicureanism Christian hedonism · Utilitarianism · Abolitionism · Yangism Key concepts Aponia · Ataraxia · Eudaimonia · Happiness · Hedone ...
Average And Total Utilitarianism - Total Utilitarianism
... Total utilitarianism is a method of applying utilitarianism to a group to work out what the best set of outcomes would be ... The main problem for total utilitarianism is the "mere addition paradox", which argues that a likely outcome of following total utilitarianism is a future where there is a ... paradox with a consistent model of total utilitarianism, total utilitarians have two choices ...
Sociology Of Punishment - Utilitarianism - Critique of Utilitarianism
... However a NSW Prison Report found that 13% of inmates have an intellectual disability at the point of sentencing, indigenous persons are sentenced to imprisonment at about 10 times the rate expected given their relative population size of the above, 50% of crimes fell into theft, driving or offences against justice 50% of offences resulting in imprisonment over 58% were for non-violent crimes 14,154 (37%) out of a total of 38,626 persons who spent some time in full custody between June 1995 and June 1999, have been to prison at least once before, and almost half of those (18%) have been at least twice “the majority of prisoners who pass through the system serve sentences of less than 6 months and are in minimum security or serving periodic detention From these and other statistics, researchers and Mann, 1995] have suggested utilitarian justifications cannot be overwhelming assumed from the studied data ... One conclusion that can and is often drawn from prison statistics, however is that Whatever regional and national differences there might be in opinions about which offences deserve custody, the poor, the disturbed, the migrant, disadvantaged ethnic minorities are consistently over-penalised and over-imprisoned What then is the reason that we imprison these people? Utilitarianists have no answer ...
Two-level Utilitarianism - Criticisms
... Apart from the criticisms that are commonly made of utilitarianism in general, there are several criticisms made specifically against two-level ... One objection is that two-level utilitarianism undermines an agent's commitment to act in accordance with his or her moral principles ... objection, some utilitarians have put forward a "radical proposal" although they accept utilitarianism as the correct moral theory, it would be more beneficial if we do ...
Average And Total Utilitarianism
... Utilitarianism states that the quality of conscious experience is important indeed it is the basis of its consequentialist approach to ethics ... to this problem are provided by average and total utilitarianism ...