**Informal Definition**

*For a detailed presentation of the various points of view around the definition of "algorithm" see Algorithm characterizations. For examples of simple addition algorithms specified in the detailed manner described in Algorithm characterizations, see Algorithm examples.*

While there is no generally accepted *formal* definition of "algorithm," an informal definition could be "a set of rules that precisely defines a sequence of operations." For some people, a program is only an algorithm if it stops eventually; for others, a program is only an algorithm if it stops before a given number of calculation steps.

A prototypical example of an algorithm is Euclid's algorithm to determine the maximum common divisor of two integers; an example (there are others) is described by the flow chart above and as an example in a later section.

Boolos & Jeffrey (1974, 1999) offer an informal meaning of the word in the following quotation:

No human being can write fast enough, or long enough, or small enough† ( †"smaller and smaller without limit ...you'd be trying to write on molecules, on atoms, on electrons") to list all members of an enumerably infinite set by writing out their names, one after another, in some notation. But humans can do something equally useful, in the case of certain enumerably infinite sets: They can give **explicit instructions for determining the nth member of the set**, for arbitrary finite

*n*. Such instructions are to be given quite explicitly, in a form in which

**they could be followed by a computing machine**, or by a

**human who is capable of carrying out only very elementary operations on symbols.**

The term "enumerably infinite" means "countable using integers perhaps extending to infinity." Thus Boolos and Jeffrey are saying that an algorithm implies instructions for a process that "creates" output integers from an *arbitrary* "input" integer or integers that, in theory, can be chosen from 0 to infinity. Thus an algorithm can be an algebraic equation such as **y = m + n**—two arbitrary "input variables" **m** and **n** that produce an output **y**. But various authors' attempts to define the notion indicate that the word implies much more than this, something on the order of (for the addition example):

- Precise instructions (in language understood by "the computer") for a fast, efficient, "good" process that specifies the "moves" of "the computer" (machine or human, equipped with the necessary internally contained information and capabilities) to find, decode, and then process arbitrary input integers/symbols
**m**and**n**, symbols**+**and**=**... and "effectively" produce, in a "reasonable" time, output-integer**y**at a specified place and in a specified format.

The concept of *algorithm* is also used to define the notion of decidability. That notion is central for explaining how formal systems come into being starting from a small set of axioms and rules. In logic, the time that an algorithm requires to complete cannot be measured, as it is not apparently related with our customary physical dimension. From such uncertainties, that characterize ongoing work, stems the unavailability of a definition of *algorithm* that suits both concrete (in some sense) and abstract usage of the term.

Read more about this topic: Algorithm

### Other articles related to "informal definition":

**Informal Definition**

... Because the Electoral College has grown in size, the results are normalized to compensate ... For example, take two elections, 1848 and 1968 ...

**Informal Definition**

... Key to the use of abstract time is the timeout operator, which presents two processes, one to behave as if the clock ticks, one to behave as if it can't, i.e.. ...

### Famous quotes containing the words definition and/or informal:

“Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?

Is God by *definition* indifferent, beyond us all?

Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul

Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?”

—Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

“We as a nation need to be reeducated about the necessary and sufficient conditions for making human beings human. We need to be reeducated not as parents—but as workers, neighbors, and friends; and as members of the organizations, committees, boards—and, especially, the *informal* networks that control our social institutions and thereby determine the conditions of life for our families and their children.”

—Urie Bronfenbrenner (b. 1917)