In the context of corporate finance, the tax benefits of debt or tax advantage of debt refers to the fact that from a tax perspective it is cheaper for firms and investors to finance with debt than with equity. Under a majority of taxation systems around the world, and until recently under the U.S. tax system, firms are taxed on their profits and individuals are taxed on their personal income.
For example, a firm that earns $100 dollars in profits in the U.S. would have to pay around $30 dollars in taxes. If it then distributes these profits to its owners as dividends, then the owners in turn pay taxes on this income, say $20 on the $70 dollars of dividends. The $100 dollars of profits turned into $50 dollars of investor income.
If, instead the firm finances with debt, then, assuming the firm owes $100 dollars of interest to investors, its profits are now 0. Investors now pay taxes on their interest income, say $30 dollars. This implies for $100 dollars of profits before taxes, investors got $70 dollars.
This tax-related encouragement of debt financing has not gone uncriticized. For example, some critics have argued that the cost of equity should also be deductible; which could reduce the Internal Revenue Code's influence on capital-structure decisions, potentially reducing the economic instability attributable to excessive debt financing.
Read more about Tax Benefits Of Debt: See Also
Other articles related to "tax benefits of debt":
Famous quotes containing the words debt, tax and/or benefits:
“The debt was the most sacred obligation incurred during the war. It was by no means the largest in amount. We do not haggle with those who lent us money. We should not with those who gave health and blood and life. If doors are opened to fraud, contrive to close them. But dont deny the obligation, or scold at its performance.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (18221893)
“If you tax too high, the revenue will yield nothing.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“Unfortunately, we cannot rely solely on employers seeing that it is in their self-interest to change the workplace. Since the benefits of family-friendly policies are long-term, they may not be immediately visible or quantifiable; companies tend to look for success in the bottom line. On a deeper level, we are asking those in power to change the rules by which they themselves succeeded and with which they identify.”
—Anne C. Weisberg (20th century)