For an elementary system, let 1 ∨ 2 represent the state of knowledge "The system is in the state one or the state 2." Under this model, there are six states of maximal knowledge that can be obtained: 1 ∨ 2, 1 ∨ 3, 1 ∨ 4, 2 ∨ 3, 2 ∨ 4 and 3 ∨ 4. There is also a single state less than maximal knowledge, corresponding to 1 ∨ 2 ∨ 3 ∨ 4. These can be mapped to six qubit states in a natural manner;
- Failed to parse (Cannot store math image on filesystem.): 3 lor 4 iff | 1 rangle
- Failed to parse (Cannot store math image on filesystem.): 1 lor 3 iff | + rangle
- Failed to parse (Cannot store math image on filesystem.): 2 lor 4 iff | - rangle
- Failed to parse (Cannot store math image on filesystem.): 1 lor 4 iff | i rangle
- Failed to parse (Cannot store math image on filesystem.): 2 lor 3 iff | -i rangle
- Failed to parse (Cannot store math image on filesystem.): 1 lor 2 lor 3 lor 4 iff I/2
Under this mapping, it is clear that two states of knowledge in the toy theory correspond to two orthogonal states for the qubit if and only if they share no ontic states in common. This mapping also gives analogues in the toy model to quantum fidelity, compatibility, convex combinations of states and coherent superposition, and can be mapped to the Bloch sphere in the natural fashion. However, the analogy breaks down to a degree when considering coherent superposition, as one of the forms of the coherent superposition in the toy model returns a state which is orthogonal to what is expected with the corresponding superposition in the quantum model, and this can be shown to be an intrinsic difference between the two systems. This reinforces the earlier point that this model is not a restricted version of quantum mechanics, but instead a separate model which mimics quantum properties.
Read more about this topic: Spekkens Toy Model
Other articles related to "elementary systems, system":
... A pair of elementary systems has 16 combined ontic states, corresponding to the combinations of the numbers 1 through 4 with 1 through 4 (i.e ... the system can be in the state (1,1), (1,2), etc.) The epistemic state of the system is limited by the knowledge balance principle once again ... Now however, not only does it restrict the knowledge of the system as a whole, but also of both of the constituent subsystems ...
... measurements (measurements which cause the system after the measurement to be consistent with the results of the measurement) are considered ... For instance, we could measure whether the system is in states 1 or 2, 1 or 3, or 1 or 4, corresponding to 1 ∨ 2, 1 ∨ 3, and 1 ∨ 4 ... done, one's state of knowledge about the system in question is updated specifically, if one measured the system in the state 2 ∨ 4, then the system ...
Famous quotes containing the words systems and/or elementary:
“What avails it that you are a Christian, if you are not purer than the heathen, if you deny yourself no more, if you are not more religious? I know of many systems of religion esteemed heathenish whose precepts fill the reader with shame, and provoke him to new endeavors, though it be to the performance of rites merely.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“When the Devil quotes Scriptures, its not, really, to deceive, but simply that the masses are so ignorant of theology that somebody has to teach them the elementary texts before he can seduce them.”
—Paul Goodman (19111972)