Qur'an Oath Controversy of The 110th United States Congress

Qur'an Oath Controversy Of The 110th United States Congress

In mid-November 2006 it was reported that Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to the United States Congress (for Minnesota's 5th congressional district), "will take his oath of office with his hand upon the Qur'an, the Islamic holy book." In reaction to the news, conservative media pundit Dennis Prager criticized the decision in his November 28, 2006 column entitled "America, not Keith Ellison, decides what book a Congressman takes his oath on."

The column attracted national attention from both Ellison and Prager supporters. Presented with the fact that all members of the House swear in (or affirm) en masse without the use of any religious text, and that such works are only used in ceremonial reenactments afterwards, Prager stated "that’s the whole point: it’s exactly because it’s ceremonial that it matters". In response to a wave of criticism, Prager released another column on the topic on December 5, 2006 entitled "A response to my many critics - and a solution".

The controversy became more heated when Rep. Virgil Goode (R - VA) issued a letter to his constituents stating his view that Ellison's decision to use the Qur'an is a threat to "the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America... if American citizens don’t wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran." The entering of Goode into the controversy caused many other members of Congress to weigh in.

Ellison went on to use the Qur'an owned by Thomas Jefferson for the swearing-in ceremony.

Read more about Qur'an Oath Controversy Of The 110th United States Congress:  Constitutional Provisions, Questions On "unbroken Tradition", Prager Rescinds Call For Ellison Not To Serve, Prager Dismisses Tanakh Oaths, Oath Ceremonies of First Buddhists in Congressional History, Prager Calls On Ellison To Bring Bible With Qur'an, Sharia Rather Than Constitution?, Prager's Dec. 27, 2006 Column, Organizational Responses, The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council's Resolution, Minnesotans' Responses, Impact of Rep. Virgil Goode, Ellison's Union Hall Remarks, Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an

Other articles related to "110th, congress, oath":

Qur'an Oath Controversy Of The 110th United States Congress - Opening Day of The 110th Congress - Ceremonial Reenactment
... After the members of the 110th House of Representatives were sworn in en masse, Ellison was the first Representative scheduled to have his picture taken with the new Speaker of the House ... Though the Library of Congress is directly across the street from the Capitol, Thomas Jefferson’s Quran took fifteen minutes to arrive as it was brought through "a long, winding ... A few minutes later, Nancy Pelosi arrived and photos of a ceremonial reenactment oath were taken ...

Famous quotes containing the words states, congress, united, oath and/or controversy:

    fundamentally an organism has conscious mental states if and only if there is something that it is like to be that organism—something it is like for the organism.
    Thomas Nagel (b. 1938)

    I need not tell you of the inadequacy of the American shipping marine on the Pacific Coast.... For this reason it seems to me that there is no subject to which Congress can better devote its attention in the coming session than the passage of a bill which shall encourage our merchant marine in such a way as to establish American lines directly between New York and the eastern ports and South American ports, and both our Pacific Coast ports and the Orient and the Philippines.
    William Howard Taft (1857–1930)

    Scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question.
    Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859)

    It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.
    Aeschylus (525–456 B.C.)

    And therefore, as when there is a controversy in an account, the parties must by their own accord, set up for right Reason, the Reason of some Arbitrator, or Judge, to whose sentence, they will both stand, or their controversy must either come to blows, or be undecided, for want of a right Reason constituted by Nature; so is it also in all debates of what kind soever.
    Thomas Hobbes (1579–1688)