The nature versus nurture debate concerns the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature," i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences ("nurture," i.e. empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in physical and behavioral traits.
The phrase "Nature versus nurture" in its modern sense was coined by the English Victorian polymath Francis Galton in discussion of the influence of heredity and environment on social advancement, although the terms had been contrasted previously, for example by Shakespeare (in his play, The Tempest: 4.1). Galton was influenced by the book On the Origin of Species written by his cousin, Charles Darwin. The concept embodied in the phrase has been criticized for its binary simplification of two tightly interwoven parameters, as for example an environment of wealth, education and social privilege are often historically passed to genetic offspring. The difference being that wealth, education and social privilege are not part of the human biological system, and so cannot be directly attributed to genetics.
The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from "nurture" was termed tabula rasa ("blank slate") by philosopher John Locke, and proposes that humans develop from only environmental influences. This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, most modern psychologists and anthropologists consider the question naive—representing an outdated state of knowledge.
In the social and political sciences, the nature versus nurture debate may be contrasted with the structure versus agency debate (i.e. socialization versus individual autonomy). For a discussion of nature versus nurture in language and other human universals, see also psychological nativism.
Read more about Nature Versus Nurture: Scientific Approach, Heritability Estimates, Interaction of Genes and Environment, Advanced Techniques, Nature and Nurture, IQ Debate, Personality Traits, Genomics, Philosophical Difficulties, Use in Fiction, Implications in Law
Other articles related to "nature, nurture, nature versus nurture":
... makes a critical difference in the way we think about nature and nurture ... a journalist's question of "which, nature or nurture, contributes more to personality?" by asking in response, "Which contributes more to the area of a rectangle, its length ... Scientific approaches also seek to break down variance beyond these two categories of nature and nurture ...
... As discussed in Nature versus nurture, the biological "nature" of individual innate qualities can account for many decisions and actions, such as family history in ... On the other hand, the cause of behavior can be due to the environmental "nurture" of an individual's behavioral modification, from positive relationships to negative abuse, with ... Some groups accept both "nature" and "nurture" as equally valid sides of a person's psyche, while studying each individual major action on a case-by-case analysis basis ...
... Nature versus nurture is a popular phrase used to describe debates over the relative degrees to which one's genetic makeup (nature) and one's life experiences (nurture) influence one's traits or attributes ...
... The nature-nurture controversy was a psychiatric proposal to explain the increase in and motive behind juvenile delinquency ... Supporters of the “nature” side suggested that some people are born evil or with malicious tendencies ... The idea that nature prevails over nurture is implied in The Bad Seed ...
Famous quotes containing the words nature and/or nurture:
“The beauty of the internal nature cannot be so far concealed by its accidental vesture, but that the spirit of its form shall communicate itself to the very disguise and indicate the shape it hides from the manner in which it is worn. A majestic form and graceful motions will express themselves through the most barbarous and tasteless costume.”
—Percy Bysshe Shelley (17921822)
“Preschool children are more sophisticated than toddlers.... Your goal as a parent is to nurture the childs desire to be a self-starter and help him begin to adopt some of your attitudes and values, but without humiliating the child or suppressing his newfound assertiveness”
—Lawrence Balter (20th century)