**Type A and Type B Evaluation of Uncertainty**

Knowledge about an input quantity is inferred from repeated measured values (*Type A evaluation of uncertainty*), or scientific judgement or other information concerning the possible values of the quantity (*Type B evaluation of uncertainty*).

In Type A evaluations of measurement uncertainty, the assumption is often made that the distribution best describing an input quantity given repeated measured values of it (obtained independently) is a Gaussian distribution. then has expectation equal to the average measured value and standard deviation equal to the standard deviation of the average. When the uncertainty is evaluated from a small number of measured values (regarded as instances of a quantity characterized by a Gaussian distribution), the corresponding distribution can be taken as a -distribution. Other considerations apply when the measured values are not obtained independently.

For a Type B evaluation of uncertainty, often the only available information is that lies in a specified interval . In such a case, knowledge of the quantity can be characterized by a rectangular probability distribution with limits and . If different information were available, a probability distribution consistent with that information would be used.

Read more about this topic: Measurement Uncertainty

### Famous quotes containing the words uncertainty, type and/or evaluation:

“Now, since our condition accommodates things to itself, and transforms them according to itself, we no longer know things in their reality; for nothing comes to us that is not altered and falsified by our Senses. When the compass, the square, and the rule are untrue, all the calculations drawn from them, all the buildings erected by their measure, are of necessity also defective and out of plumb. The *uncertainty* of our senses renders uncertain everything that they produce.”

—Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)

“The more characteristic American hero in the earlier day, and the more beloved *type* at all times, was not the hustler but the whittler.”

—Mark Sullivan (1874–1952)

“Good critical writing is measured by the perception and *evaluation* of the subject; bad critical writing by the necessity of maintaining the professional standing of the critic.”

—Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)