The aim of this list of programming languages is to include all notable programming languages in existence, both those in current use and historical ones, in alphabetical order, except for dialects of BASIC and esoteric programming languages.
- Note: Dialects of BASIC have been moved to the separate List of BASIC dialects.
- Note: This page does not list esoteric programming languages.
| Contents: |
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z See also |
|---|
Read more about List Of Programming Languages: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z
Other articles related to "programming languages, languages, programming":
... The forms !=, /= or are generally used in programming languages where ease of typing and use of ASCII text is preferred.) 2 + 2 ≠ 5 < > strict inequality is less than, is ... The forms = are generally used in programming languages where ease of typing and use of ASCII text is preferred.) 3 ≤ 4 and 5 ≤ 5 ... ≥ 4 and 5 ≥ 5 subgroup is a subgroup of ... The symbol * is generally used in programming languages, where ease of typing and use of ASCII text is preferred.) 7 × 8 = 56 Cartesian product the Cartesian ...
... In Lisp family languages such as Common Lisp, Scheme, and others, functions are objects, just like strings, vectors, lists, and numbers ... Many uses of functors in languages like C++ are simply emulations of the missing closure constructor ... that gives us function objects, which are a computer programming construct allowing an object to be invoked or called as if it were an ordinary function, usually with the same ...
Famous quotes containing the words languages and/or programming:
“It is time for dead languages to be quiet.”
—Natalie Clifford Barney (1876–1972)
“If there is a price to pay for the privilege of spending the early years of child rearing in the driver’s seat, it is our reluctance, our inability, to tolerate being demoted to the backseat. Spurred by our success in programming our children during the preschool years, we may find it difficult to forgo in later states the level of control that once afforded us so much satisfaction.”
—Melinda M. Marshall (20th century)