International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
The International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union was once one of the largest labor unions in the United States, one of the first U.S. unions to have a primarily female membership, and a key player in the labor history of the 1920s and 1930s. The union, generally referred to as the "ILGWU" or the "ILG," merged with the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union in 1995 to form the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE). UNITE merged with the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union (HERE) in 2004 to create a new union known as UNITE HERE. The two unions that formed UNITE in 1995 represented only 250,000 workers between them, down from the ILGWU's peak membership of 450,000 in 1969.
Read more about International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union: Early History, The Uprising of 20,000 and The Great Revolt, The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire and Its Aftermath, Growth and Turmoil, Internal Battles, Dubinsky's Rise To Power, The Great Depression and The CIO, Electoral Politics, Other Social and Cultural Efforts, Decline of The Union, Look For The Union Label
Other articles related to "garments, union":
... its members in the 1970s for an advertising jingle to advocate buying ILGWU-made garments ... The winner was Look for the union label ... The Union's "Look for the Union Label" song went as follows Look for the union label When you are buying a coat, dress, or blouse, Remember somewhere our ...
Famous quotes containing the words union and/or garment:
“If in madness of delusion, anyone shall lift his parricidal hand against this blessed union ... the arms of thousands will be raised to save it, and the curse of millions will fall upon the head which may have plotted its destruction.”
—Andrew Jackson (17671845)
“Fashion is the most intense expression of the phenomenon of neomania, which has grown ever since the birth of capitalism. Neomania assumes that purchasing the new is the same as acquiring value.... If the purchase of a new garment coincides with the wearing out of an old one, then obviously there is no fashion. If a garment is worn beyond the moment of its natural replacement, there is pauperization. Fashion flourishes on surplus, when someone buys more than he or she needs.”
—Stephen Bayley (b. 1951)