Several types of cognitive bias occur due to an attentional bias. One example occurs when a person does not examine all possible outcomes when making a judgment about a correlation or association. They may focus on one or two possibilities, while ignoring the rest.
The most commonly studied type of decision for attentional bias, is one in which there are two conditions (A and B), which can be present (P) or not present (N). This leaves four possible combination outcomes: both are present (AP/BP), both are not present (AN/BN), only A is present (AP/BN), only B is present (AN/BP). This can be better shown in table form:
|A Present||A Not Present|
|B Not Present||AP/BN||AN/BN|
In everyday life, people are often subject to this type of attentional bias when asking themselves, "Does God answer prayers?" Many would say "Yes" and justify it with "many times I've asked God for something, and He's given it to me." These people would be accepting and overemphasizing the data from the present/present (top-left) cell, because an unbiased person would counter this logic and consider data from the present/absent cell. "Has God ever given me something that I didn't ask for?" Or "Have I asked God for something and didn't receive it?" This experiment too supports Smedslund's general conclusion that subjects tend to ignore part of the table.
Attentional biases can also influence what information people are likely to focus upon. For instance, patients with anxiety disorders and chronic pain show increased attention to information representing their concerns (i.e., angry and painful facial expressions respectively) in studies using the dot-probe paradigm. It is important to note that two different forms of attentional bias may be measured. A 'within-subjects' bias occurs when an individual displays greater bias towards one type of information (e.g., painful faces) when compared to different types of information (e.g., neutral faces). A 'between-subjects' bias, alternatively, occurs when one group of participants displays greater bias than another group of participants (e.g., chronic pain patients shown greater bias towards painful expressions than healthy control participants). These two types of bias therefore arise due to different mechanisms, and both are not always present in the same sample of participants. Another commonly used paradigm to measure attentional biases is the Stroop paradigm.
Other articles related to "attentional bias, attentional, bias":
... Attentional bias often seen in eye tracking movements is thought to be an underlying issue of addiction ...
... One of the studies that concentrated on testing if attentional bias has an effect on eating disorders is one performed by Shafran, Lee, Cooper, Palmer and Fairburn (2007) ... hypothesis for this experiment was that attentional biases will be more prevalent for eating weight and shape in patients who suffered from an eating disorder than in the ... The results indicate that there was a significant bias for the “good” body image pictures shown by patients with an eating disorder ...
... Attentional bias in emotional disorders ... Attentional bias for valenced stimuli as a function of personality in the dot-probe task ... Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety Manipulation of Stimulus Duration ...
... have recently begun using a modified version of the dot-probe task to retrain the attentional bias ... Over the course of a number of trials the attentional bias for salient stimuli can be reduced (in the case of the 'replace-neutral' condition) or enhanced (in the ... This method of retraining the attentional bias is called attentional retraining ...
Famous quotes containing the word bias:
“The solar system has no anxiety about its reputation, and the credit of truth and honesty is as safe; nor have I any fear that a skeptical bias can be given by leaning hard on the sides of fate, of practical power, or of trade, which the doctrine of Faith cannot down-weigh.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)