1997 Rebellion in Albania - Usury

Usury

Pyramid schemes, also known as rentier firms, started their operations in 1991. Their activity was based on obtaining a quantity of money and returning a greater amount based on a percentage. Although apparently functioning as a bank, pyramids had no concrete investment from which to glean money and apparently did not lend. The first pyramid scheme, which opened in 1991, was that of Hajdin Sejdisë, who later fled to Switzerland with several million dollars of Albanian businessmen. It was followed by 'Sudja' of Maksude Kadëna in 1993, a Gipsy who had previously worked as a worker in a shoe factory. By the end of 1996, pyramid schemes reached their peak. Interests that they offered were very tempting, where Sudja managed to provide 100% interest, which warned of imminent bankruptcy. Despite the advice of the IMF to close these schemes, the Albanian democratic government continued to allow their activities, often being involved in and personally profiting from them. In the period between 8 and 16 January 1997, the vast majority of the pyramids schemes collapsed, taking with them the life savings of Albanians. On 22 January, the government froze the 'Xhaferri' firm. 'Gjallica', another firm, was half bankrupt while the 'Vefa' firm, which had managed to carry out some investment in the Albanian market in hotels, fuel and factories, continued normal activity. The social crisis that the collapse of the pyramid schemes brought was arguably the worst in the history of Albania, a history which has often seen the very existence of Albania at risk.

The first protest held to resolve the crisis was that of 16 January in the South. On 19 January, Tirana saw protest of the 'Sudja' creditors. On 24 January began the "de facto" rebellion with thousands of people in Lushnja who had lost money marching on the city hall in protest against the government's support of the schemes. The protest quickly descended into violence. Police forces were routed, the city hall and adjoining cinema burnt. One day later, on 25 January, Tritan Shehu, chairman of the Democratic Party, was sent to Lushnje to resolve the situation; however on his arrival was held hostage for several hours at City Stadium and assaulted by the protesters. State Special Forces intervened in the city to extract Shehu. In the morning, every government institution in the city was looted, destroyed and burnt down. On 26 and 27 January violence erupted in other southern towns such as Vlora on the coast. On 30 January, the Forum for Democracy was formed by opposition parties with the role to lead the anti-government protests. The reasons for the protests were originally economic, with nearly every family in Albania having lost money in the pyramid schemes but naturally, anger was also directed against President Sali Berisha and against the government for allowing the schemes to continue despite the advice of the IMF. As allegations grew that Sali Berisha and others in government had personally profited from the schemes, many became convinced that the democratic party must be removed by force. This was especially true in the city of Vlora. On 4 February, distribution of a portion of lost money began at the counters of the National Commercial Bank, owned by the state. Rather than subduing the protests, this on the contrary increased people's suspicion of government involvement. On 5 February, the 'Gjallica' firm declared bankruptcy, and on 6 February violent protests resumed in Vlora. On 9 February, State Police were attacked in Vlora, and a day later, also in the South, fifty Special Force soldiers attacked and brutally dispersed protesters.

Read more about this topic:  1997 Rebellion In Albania

Other articles related to "usury":

Avignon Exchange - Background - Theology of Usury
... and loopholes related to the conduct of traditional lending (usury), there is very little scholastic thought on foreign exchange transactions except insofar as they related to the covering of loan ... were the main victims of the campaigns waged against usury by friars like Bernardino of Feltre, but the big bankers and international connections were left undisturbed ... of papal funds." Thus, "Profit and Loss on Exchange" (Pro e danno di cambio) was not considered usury and was frequently listed in accounting books ...
Loans And Interest In Judaism - In Classical Rabbinical Literature
... to prevent evasion of the scriptural injunction against usury, preferring to forbid moral usury to trying to mitigate the scriptural rules in this area ... one of the biblical verbs referring to usury, namely tashshik, to be in the causative voice due to the Talmud's figurative interpretation of the lifnei iver regulation, it even regards any ... this meant that rabbinical courts made judgements in cases of usury but refused to enforce them by anything other than physical attacks against the lender's ...
Thought Of Thomas Aquinas - Usury
... The Fifth Lateran Council defined usury as "from its use, a thing which produces nothing is applied to the acquiring of gain and profit without any work, any expense ... Thomas asserted that usury was a violation of natural moral law ... Yet usury allows this face value to fluctuate, and hence the value of money can be diminished, thereby robbing the person who has purchased the money ...
Credit Card Interest - Laws - Usury
... Many nations limit the amount of interest that can be charged (often called usury laws) ... Most countries strictly regulate the manner in which interest rates are agreed, calculated, and disclosed ...